FPDY189
Free Paper (Deformity)
Automated Alpha Angle Calculation for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery Planning Using Deep Learning Pose Model
Tan Shun Herng. Lee Sin Ying, Saturveithan A/L Chandirasegaran, Chiu Chee Kidd, Chan Chris Yin Wei, Kwan Mun Keong
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Orthopaedic Centre of Excellence for Research and Learning (NOCERAL), Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Accurate selection of lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) tilt is essential to prevent distal adding-on in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. We previously showed that achieving an intraoperative LIV tilt (β)
≥ preoperative Alpha Angle (α) from supine left side- bending radiographs reduced adding-on to 10%. This study aimed to develop an AI model to automate Alpha Angle calculation and provide an objective, patient-specific LIV tilt target. This study included 249 AIS patients (Lenke 1–6) undergoing posterior spinal fusion. Supine left side-bending radiographs were divided into training (n=199) and validation (n=50) sets. A YOLOv11-pose CNN was trained to identify T11–L4 vertebrae and the pelvis to calculate the Alpha Angle. Performance was validated against expert consensus using ICC, mean absolute error, clinical success rates (±3° and ±5°), and mean average precision. The AI system achieved robust technical performance on the validation set, with a bounding box mAP50 of 99.4% and pose estimation mAP50 of 97.6%. In clinical validation, the model demonstrated excellent reliability with an ICC of 0.931 (95% CI: 0.89–0.96). The Mean Absolute Error was 1.68°, with negligible systematic bias (-0.12°; p=0.78). The AI achieved a clinical success rate of 92.0% within a 5° threshold and 80.0% within a 3° threshold. AI- surgeon agreement rate at 3° was 80.0%, and at 5° was 94.0%. There was no significant difference in X-angle, Alpha angle, and adjusted Alpha angle between surgeon consensus and AI. For the Y-angle, the AI measured a significantly lower displacement (p-value<0.001). Stratified analysis showed robust accuracy from T11 to L1, though reliability decreased at the L2 level (ICC=0.39). This study introduces the first AI system to automate Alpha Angle calculation for AIS surgical planning, demonstrating expert- level reliability (ICC >0.93) and accuracy exceeding inter-surgeon variability. With 92% of measurements within 5° of expert consensus, it provides a rapid and consistent alternative to manual measurement, bridging complex modeling and practical clinical application.
